Skip to main content

Overpowering the Regularities of School

Shared by Bruce Dixon as part of last week's change.school provocations, HundrED.org is a Finnish organization gathering information from school leaders and change agents about the future of education. "Innovations" provides an exhibition of creative, ambitious, and purposeful educational projects from around the world. Take a look, these luminous examples challenge long-held beliefs about what typically gets prioritized in schools. Are our more traditional priorities influenced by what Seymour Sarason calls the "regularities of school culture"?



In everyday terms, Sarason says, "the ways of doing business in school" can be detrimental to a school's mission and vision, yet they go largely "unexamined and unchallenged" by educators. When we have conversations beginning with "why" we start to dig into some of these issues and expose some misguided priorities. We put an appropriate focus on our beliefs about school and learning.

Example, if creative communication is part of a school's mission statement, why are social media sites blocked on the wireless network? If sleep is essential to the development of youngsters, why does school start at 8:00 AM? Why do teachers give homework? If collaboration is a valued 21st-century skill, why do students sit in desks arranged in rows? Why the continued use of letter grades? Many times the insufficient, but truthful answer is, "because that's always the way it's been done around here."

Bruce said he likes to call these regularities of school "the learning architecture," but how many of our school regularities are actually pernicious to learning? In her popular book, "Shift This," friend and colleague, Joy Kirr discusses what she suggests are small changes she has made to the regularities of her classroom. The resulting practices have created "joyful" challenges, and also significant improvements in the learning of her students. To summarize, Joy's students are engaged and empowered because they serve as teachers sharing what they have learned through inquiry and discovery. No grades, no points, no homework, traditionalists would say these are dramatic shifts in classroom architecture. Alfie Kohn would give these "joyful learners" two thumbs up.

Pressed to answer truthfully, most educators believe schools, to best meet the needs of modern learners, need to make some fundamental changes to their "architecture". From the examples discussed, incremental changes have had a seemingly insignificant effect. What are the priorities of school? Of these priorities which ones can be considered counterproductive to learning? Maybe, just maybe, the key to overpowering some of the more misguided regularities of school is to capacitate those closest to the fray.

Related Reading

Dixon, Bruce. "The Art of Unlearning", Modern Learners. October 15, 2017.

photo credit: Lord is Good Soldier Field - Chicago via photopin (license)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Teachers Can Learn From Effective Coaches

In my educational world teaching and coaching involve the same processes. The people that impacted my own learning most significantly were coaches. Could it be that great coaches were ahead of their time with respects to instructional best practices? Let's take a look at ten coaching practices that thankfully have found their way into the classroom. http://www.coachwooden.com/files/PyramidThinkingSuccess.jpg Standards-based Grading - coaches aren't concerned with arbitrary measures of success such as letter grades. Great coaches identify a requisite set of skills that are necessary for advancement and success. Promotion and achievement are based upon clearly identified levels of skill mastery.  Authentic assessment - coaches are looking for their athletes to demonstrate their skill mastery under game-like situations. The best coaches incorporate game simulations and competitive, game-like drills into their practices. Winning coaches will use the contests as assess

Board Games in the School Library: 3 Reasons Why It's a Winning Play

"Play is the highest form of research."  - Albert Einstein “Play is the work of the child.”  – Maria Montessori In our recently remodeled school media center, we have a space dedicated to active engagement in fun learning activities. Part maker space, part literacy lounge, board games are being incorporated to promote a culture of joyful learning. Whether it's a game of Rummy , Yahtzee , or Scrabble , family game night serves as a communication elixir and solidifies our domestic climate of togetherness. Shouldn't similar opportunities for interaction, challenge, and fun exist somewhere in our schools? Broken families, cultural fragmentation, and poverty are impacting opportunities for children to play. As we unpacked and tagged our new media center games, I was more disappointed than shocked by the number of students who had never played Monopoly , Boggle , or Sorry . One skeptical teacher commented, "Oh great, now we're letting students pl

Self-Directed vs. Self-Determined Learning; What's the Difference?

"We need to move beyond the idea that an education is something that is provided for us, and toward the idea that an education is something that we create for ourselves." - Stephen Downes In this age of abundance of information, shifting classroom pedagogy isn't nearly enough to make learning in school more relevant and authentic for the learner. Self-directed learning ( andragogy ), and self-determined learning ( heutagogy ) are the ideals necessary in making students " future ready " to live and learn in a web-connected world. While original research applied these concepts to mature learners, it has become apparent that even young children have an abundant capacity for recognizing and directing their learning. Anyone who has observed toddlers learning how to walk and talk understand the motivation and skill development that quickly develops during these processes. Considered by some to be on a learning continuum, self-directed learning, and self-determined